I live in a world too full of ideas and beliefs. Everything that is demanded of me appears to be metrics that are socially constructed, whose sole task is to inform myself of my identity in relation to society. As time passes, everyone around me seems to be falling into the same trap, cherishing the representations that best suit them. I am no exception, of course; by investing in ideas that constitute my being, I invariably run the risk of perpetually seeking a new idea to make myself a little bit better, a little bit more caught up with the idea of personal evolution. At this very moment, pressure comes not just from outside spectators; it also comes from my own volition to make myself one of them. But somehow, unfortunately, the faces have started to look the same, and I cannot differentiate my own voice from theirs. It is as if the angelic voice of society has penetrated the core of my soul and simultaneously confused my voice with its own. I often wonder why it is the case that we wishfully demand NOTHING from other people, for it seems to me that doing so effectively prevents us from making ourselves a means to their end. On the contrary, we hold a totally different standard when it comes to our own treatment: we impose the weight of everything on ourselves, hoping that one day it will take us to a higher ground. This notion implies a logical inconsistency: how would the imposition of heavier weight make us any lighter? And from that, I started to doubt whether freedom and peace are what we truly long for, or whether we want something else so outrageous that it masquerades as something we think it should be? When asked to describe ourselves, we intuitively provide the best answer we can. By carefully weaving words into a cohesive narrative, the idea of ourselves is established and this instinctual idea always comes first in such circumstances, for it has proven to be a decent strategy to rescue ourselves from the embarrassment of having nothing to say with respect to who we are. In this case, having nothing to say about ourselves is a deadly sin to be avoided at all costs. However, there are people out there who are polite enough not to execute someone with their one-sided prejudices, but nonetheless, no one remains silent when it comes to describing themselves, even though they are greatly mistaken for who they really are. The advent of technology has made it possible for us to express ourselves in many different ways, and everyone seems desperate for such moments of expression in the modern era. Some have made themselves into a beautiful craft. They stimulate others’ senses, leading viewers to stop at the world of the exterior. The arousal of the senses gives great pleasure, and for someone who is able to cause such a huge influence on others dictates the world. Some have made themselves into a glass, being overtly honest and transparent about their inner struggles in having a meaningful life on their own terms. People like this are greatly admired for their refusal to change their exterior; to them, their interior is the secret weapon. They believe the struggles they’ve encountered will one day culminate in something majestic, thus expelling the old for the new. However, the incessant posting of such honesty to the public has baffled me. The usefulness of such an honest and internalized struggle essentially lies in the subjectiveness for its existence. It helps forge the person’s will to transcend by being reflexive within itself. Posting the process to the public means stripping its subjectivity and objectifying its presence for consumption. As a result, it no longer serves the purpose for transformative experience, but is only meant to be a performative deed that deceits the performer. I live in a world full of deliberations. The obsession to become lies at the heart of our modern civilisation, and it is precisely because of this that people conflate their wellbeing with doing more. Progress is worshipped and stagnancy is seen as something that goes against nature. No one realizes that it is not peace they seek, for peace does not come after something is done, it comes when the need to do more is obliterated. The core problem, at least to me, is not what to become, but why we need to become. To better serve humanity, I just wish to be nothing, to share nothing, to wish for nothing. I am also learning to be a total loser, someone with whom people feel secure due to my lack of competence and baggage, they can be sure that I don’t project myself onto them, and I am just there to listen with nothing to offer. It is in these moments that two souls really meet, when there is no ego, at least in one party, wanting to direct the conversation to himself. Ironically, what appears to be the most natural thing turns out to be something that needs a certain will power and discipline to achieve, what a world!